Roger_ Gunshot
Pirate Master
HYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYPE!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, I know.They're simply saying they're working their new island into the storyline that Disney had previously created.
The only thing that I see coming from that is search hits for nostalgic Googlers , which I'm unsure if that would be good or bad if that's the term it's hitting on. But I don't wanna drag out that discussion here personally.Yeah, I know.
Imagine if you're on the internet and you Google search for "Pirates of the Caribbean" and, because of your search, you happen to locate TLOPO's game website. Imagine also you have never played POTCO before nor were even aware of it nor bothered to even glance at Google's description for an explanation into TLOPO. *Further imagine yourself taking an interest in TLOPO on account of the website you had located and then clicked upon the link and then read - if said announcement is posted there as well - that this NEW island has been placed into "Disney Pirates of the Caribbean Online."
From such a scenario I share above, would you be able to understand the difference? Or look at the problem this way, what actually good does it do to throw in Disney's own name there...within such an announcement?In my opinion, it adds no value or further hype for TLOPO and the ex-POTCO community but instead could add to the possibility of confusion to result within the mind of someone on the internet not overly familiar with TLOPO.
The internet is open to everyone (even Disney) and yeah, I don't wanna drag the whole thing out here neither. I just felt compelled to do so and in the end...my track-record in persuading people about such things has been ineffective any way.The only thing that I see coming from that is search hits for nostalgic Googlers , which I'm unsure if that would be good or bad if that's the term it's hitting on. But I don't wanna drag out that discussion here personally.
I'm too tired to go find the quote right now, but I'm pretty sure they did say that they were going to be adding a new story quest for itSo does this new island also include a third story quest? That would be fantastic, especially given the name "Hidden Island". Furthermore, is it a main port or is it a wild island?
I read it. They didn't specifically say "story quest", hence my question. Pfft, you don't even know what you're talking about. Maybe you are too tired.I'm too tired to go find the quote right now, but I'm pretty sure they did say that they were going to be adding a new story quest for it
I do believe he was talking about a quote elsewhere. There is no need to be discourteous toward someone trying to answer your question.I read it. They didn't specifically say "story quest", hence my question. Pfft, you don't even know what you're talking about. Maybe you are too tired.
GameSkinny Article said:TLOPO: "Right now, we are primarily concentrating on creating TLOPO to be just like POTCO was when it closed. [We're adding a new] island containing its very own storyline, new enemies, etc. I am unable to provide more details on it at this time."
Aha, there it is, thank youI do believe he was talking about a quote elsewhere. There is no need to be discourteous toward someone trying to answer your question.
GameSkinny Article said:TLOPO: "Right now, we are primarily concentrating on creating TLOPO to be just like POTCO was when it closed. [We're adding a new] island containing its very own storyline, new enemies, etc. I am unable to provide more details on it at this time."
It wont be wild, take a look at the pictures that have been captured of it.Furthermore, is it a main port or is it a wild island?
There's no need to be rude to others.Pfft, you don't even know what you're talking about. Maybe you are too tired.
I wasn't trying to be discourteous. I was being satirical. My mistake, man.I do believe he was talking about a quote elsewhere. There is no need to be discourteous toward someone trying to answer your question.
Jack was just being sarcastic.I do believe he was talking about a quote elsewhere. There is no need to be discourteous toward someone trying to answer your question.

I wasn't trying to be discourteous. I was being satirical. My mistake, man.
Ah, it appears I misunderstood your tone then. May I suggest writing in a different style that doesn't come off as rude/ill-mannered since it is next to impossible to determine tone through text alone?Jack was just being sarcastic.![]()