1. Notice: Medals, albums, and pirate profiles will be temporarily unavailable starting later this month. Read more

Question ignoring members

Discussion in 'Forum Feedback and Suggestions' started by squintz, May 7, 2018.

  1. squintz

    squintz Pirate Lord

    Joined:
    May 19, 2017
    Messages:
    2,747
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    What, wait. I didn't see your message. Was it PM? Give me another chance, I promise not to follow you into the tattoo parlors any more.
     
    #21
  2. tiberias

    tiberias Honorable Pirate

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    356
    X
     
    #22
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2018
  3. Davy Darkrage

    Admin

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,186
    Likes Received:
    7,923
    It's not that I don't acknowledge this, it's that I'm not convinced measures beyond what already exist would be practical or effective.

    And therein lies the problem, those people would do the same thing even if the feature was more comprehensive. I've even outlined exactly how in my previous post:
    I'd argue people can make this powerful, democratic statement as-is. I don't think additional measures would prevent a determined individual on your ignore list from trying to engage with you. If enough people truly found it in themselves to ignore an individual, no matter how hard that individual tries to engage with them in public, the end result is the same. If someone you ignore is escalating their behavior and harassing you, report them. We don't tolerate flaming or trolling and they will be dealt with accordingly.
     
    #23
    Shamus The Brute likes this.
  4. tiberias

    tiberias Honorable Pirate

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    356
    X
     
    #24
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2018
    CatherineW likes this.
  5. Shamus The Brute

    Site Founder

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    3,883
    Likes Received:
    9,463
    I know the above is not directed at me but if I could, I would like to comment to what was quoted above (as someone whom hasn’t yet taken the time to read all posts written to this thread).

    Somehow, content to this forums has always been both open and transparent. I am of the opinion that this is a great thing. Also, I feel only one time since I have been affiliated with this forums did the powers-to-be ever feel a need to worry about increased registration. With the exception of that particular time-period, is was never too much of a concern (as much as I am aware) because content on this forums has always been capable of standing on it’s own two feet. *With that said, there is no greater truth online that if someone wants to pester you - they most certainly will regardless of what platform you happen to spend your time on.

    A memory to share: I recall during POTCO’s time a unruly pirate (whom hacked accounts along with other things) post a video on YouTube about a well-known pirate’s account being stolen only to show themselves DELETING said pirate’s (full) inventory! As such, in my opinion it always goes back to “where there is a will, there is a way” - type of online harassment.
     
    #25
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2018
    Captain Star likes this.
  6. Davy Darkrage

    Admin

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,186
    Likes Received:
    7,923
    That would leave the remaining discussion fragmented and difficult to follow for guests (and non-bothersome ignored users, for that matter). It would also hurt content discovery for search engines. Almost half of our traffic is users coming from searches, nearly double the amount of direct traffic:

    h1H2t4f.png

    I'm not really concerned with inflating registration numbers. If someone is interested in participating in the discussions, they can register an account. If they aren't interested in participating in the discussions, I don't have any vested interest in forcing them to create an account just to view them. I would rather the full discussions be available for anybody to see.

    And in the end, it would be immediately circumvented by your troublesome ignored user creating an additional account anyways.

    I'm not completely opposed to ideas for how to improve the feature, but preventing ignored users from viewing your public messages is not the answer.
     
    #26
  7. tiberias

    tiberias Honorable Pirate

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    356
    X
     
    #27
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2018
    CatherineW likes this.
  8. Davy Darkrage

    Admin

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,186
    Likes Received:
    7,923
    Banned users who are determined enough can and do circumvent their bans and cause additional trouble. I do concede that it's a matter of attrition, but I still think that hiding public messages would be ineffective against determined users and would be a bad idea for other reasons. I'm open to other ideas, but at the end of the day it's up to people to refuse to reciprocate with ignored users who try to engage with them.

    For what it's worth, ignored users deliberately have no way of even knowing they're ignored (unless you tell them), and I'm also wary of doing anything that would change that.

    A member who only signs up because they must isn't a member I'm interested in having either. They're unlikely to contribute meaningfully anyways, or they would have signed up without being forced. The only members I would like are those who are genuinely interested in being here. Still, that's only half of the issue. Hiding messages from guests means hiding them from Google, so search users would be less likely to find their way here to begin with.

    Thank you for starting a dialogue about the issues you have with the feature and ways in which it could be improved.
     
    #28