Jim Hexskull
Wiki Staff
Ah, I see my mistake on that part, the rest of it stands.@Jim Hexskull was the whole point of the argument was above ^ I agreed with everything else.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah, I see my mistake on that part, the rest of it stands.@Jim Hexskull was the whole point of the argument was above ^ I agreed with everything else.
That's the rules of your guild, not TLOPO. He broke the rules of your guild, and he faced the consequences from the guild, in the form of being kicked. By TLOPO rules, he had permission to kick, in the form of being promoted BY CHOICE by you to officer. If you can do it, you can do it.It's malicious behavior. enough said.
I also had gone over rules with him before he was officer and told him no booting allowed.
While this is an unfortunate situation, I agree with what JFR. We do not have any grounds to take moderation action against them. It was the decision of your guild's Guildmaster to make them an Officer. As an Officer, they had the privileges to be able to remove players from a guild. Whenever anyone is promoted to Officer it should be taken with caution. Make sure you can trust the person you promote, because it can come back and bite you if they prove to be untrustworthy.While this is an unfortunate event, TLOPO moderators will not involve themselves in any sort of guild-related drama. It's not something we can actively enforce/police. Plus, promoting someone to officer is a thing that is done voluntarily. As GM, you take liability for what your officers do.
Just my two cents on the situation.
I think before someone is banned from a guild, there should be a guild meeting between some of the officers and "higher ups" of the guild. Possibly also the GM if feasible. There is some behavior that should absolutely not be allowed, and then there are some instances where someone wasn't aware of the rules. If it a slip up with the rules, point them in the right direction on where to find the rules and regs. If they do it again, they really have no reason to say, "I didn't know."I actually agree with @Stormtimbers . It's a risk you take with promoting someone. If someone in my guild went "rogue" that's on me, it isn't on TLOPO to have to take care of it. Though, thank you for the advice! I'll be sure to be careful!
Although the trust was put into said officers I don't they should get off clean. Take the guild out of consideration for a second and think of if a pirate was doing malicious acts that disrupted the group. for example: looting on a ship with good loot and then purposefully letting the ship sink (This is just a hypothetical scenario) just for the giggles. Is it fair to those pirates that worked hard for that? They put their trust in that captain and he let them down. They shouldn't get punished for that.
I don't think this person should be banned but I feel some warning should be in place.
I understand not wanting to intervene in guild drama but I feel this is more than that because of the intents behind it. I respect all the opinions made in this thread and I think people have valid points but it started because Pie is just an upset GM who lost a friend and an officer and she wanted to reach out to the community for support or an understanding of the situation. i don't think what happened should be a reflection on Pie or the guild itself but instead more on the officer who did this.
Anyways, that's just my 2 cents. Love you Pie, you've been an awesome GM.
Correct, but as I said in two of my posts, -assuming you are referring to me- I wasn't in anyway attacking Punkin. I agree it was an unfortunate event but I didn't think it was necessary for TLOPO to have to get involved. Anyways, I'm sorry if my posts appeared as if they were attacking Punkin. I know she's a great GM, it takes a great GM to have a great guild.Alright everyone. Can we please stop lashing out at @Punkin Pie. All punkin was trying to ask was if there was any way someone could give that certain officer a punishment. There was no need to start an argument with her about how she made all of the mistakes. If I were a GM of a very successful guild like Masters N Skulls, I would be furious if one of my officers who I thought was my friend betrayed me and kicked 5 of my members, let alone 5 of my good friends. Lets all back off of her, and put yourself into her shoes and imagine what she feels like atm. It was her choice to promote him to officer, but in no way would she know that the certain person would do that. It could happen to anyone so lets all just calm down a little.
Well, in your example, yes the captain absolutely has the right to sink the ship. It's his ship, he can do with it whatever he pleases. Even if it's someone else's ship, they were the ones that got off the helm BY CHOICE, and therefore allowed someone else to take control until the captain takes the helm back. In the case of a DC, the captain has still left the ship. The remaining crew members have control of the ship, and if they choose to purposely sink it that's their choice.Although the trust was put into said officers I don't they should get off clean. Take the guild out of consideration for a second and think of if a pirate was doing malicious acts that disrupted the group. for example: looting on a ship with good loot and then purposefully letting the ship sink (This is just a hypothetical scenario) just for the giggles. Is it fair to those pirates that worked hard for that? They put their trust in that captain and he let them down. They shouldn't get punished for that.
I don't think this person should be banned but I feel some warning should be in place.
I understand not wanting to intervene in guild drama but I feel this is more than that because of the intents behind it. I respect all the opinions made in this thread and I think people have valid points but it started because Pie is just an upset GM who lost a friend and an officer and she wanted to reach out to the community for support or an understanding of the situation. i don't think what happened should be a reflection on Pie or the guild itself but instead more on the officer who did this.
Anyways, that's just my 2 cents. Love you Pie, you've been an awesome GM.
Well, in your example, yes the captain absolutely has the right to sink the ship. It's his ship, he can do with it whatever he pleases. Even if it's someone else's ship, they were the ones that got off the helm BY CHOICE, and therefore allowed someone else to take control until the captain takes the helm back. In the case of a DC, the captain has still left the ship. The remaining crew members have control of the ship, and if they choose to purposely sink it that's their choice.
If I say you can have one of my 100 cookies and ONLY ONE, then you take 50 of them, I'm gonna be mad.
I actually agree with @Stormtimbers . It's a risk you take with promoting someone. If someone in my guild went "rogue" that's on me, it isn't on TLOPO to have to take care of it. Though, thank you for the advice! I'll be sure to be careful!
I'm aware, I'm just reinforcing my point that if you can do something that the game intends for you to be able to do, you can do it.My example was hypothetical to state that it's not the fault of innocent pirates getting wrapped up in someone else's power control, guild or not it can still happen and should still be frowned upon and not just shrugged off. I wasn't trying to get technical and open up a whole new case about captains and crews.