S
Shamus The Brute
Some further clarity please on the forums "Name & Shame" position and stance. (I did not have a chance to comment to either this thread [nor was I permitted to do the same to this recent post] on account that each was locked).
As such, I have a few questions that need answered:
Shamus ~
As such, I have a few questions that need answered:
- On account of forums terms now instituted pertinent to the Name & Shame concern, can forums staff assure the community and myself in the future that no "Community Warning" announcements posted to this forums will in-turn be available to warn the community of a specific individual and/or group? If no, why not and in-turn does the forums uphold itself as the only source of warning provided to the community itself in lieu of potential threats?
- What justification does the forums solely give to take such a stance given that it has obviously worked in the past - for TLOPO - to inform readily the TLOPO community (sure, perhaps there were some implications involved but there were also 'positives' and to deny this is to view the issue itself with a certain level of bias which does not keep an open mind about the issue as a whole)
- To what extent are forums members given to even mention someone else's name? (I have 'two' [qty. 2] points to go on my forums account here I believe to where, if I mentioned someone's name publicly on either a thread or my profile, am I expected to receive said points and the punishment sustained thereafter if that person takes the use of their own name out-of-context and report me on account that they are offended)?
Shamus ~