Devin Camary
Swashbuckler
Yes, that's right. I'm talking about two handed weapons, and dual weilding.
These aren't the "heavy" weapons that weigh 20 pounds. Actually, weapons like Zweihanders (two handed greatsword, and used in renaissance era) and Halberds were 10 pounds tops. So they weren't heavy, and relatively fast.
Here's the weapon classes I thought of for 2 handed use.
Longsword http://m.imgur.com/ef9qUgh
Greatsword http://m.imgur.com/y9Mek1y
Halberd http://m.imgur.com/lT5ziND
War scythe http://m.imgur.com/H2HYCDs
Spear (I'm sure you know what that is already)
Musket (It's a spear/gun hybrid)
Now for dual wielding swords...... It's better if you have a sword and dagger, sword and buckler, or two short swords. Because you could move the sword and dagger/buckler without them hitting each other.
Usually, in historical fighting, the dagger or buckler was primarily used for parrying, then attacking with the sword. But they could be used to harm or disarm the opponent.
These aren't the "heavy" weapons that weigh 20 pounds. Actually, weapons like Zweihanders (two handed greatsword, and used in renaissance era) and Halberds were 10 pounds tops. So they weren't heavy, and relatively fast.
Here's the weapon classes I thought of for 2 handed use.
Longsword http://m.imgur.com/ef9qUgh
Greatsword http://m.imgur.com/y9Mek1y
Halberd http://m.imgur.com/lT5ziND
War scythe http://m.imgur.com/H2HYCDs
Spear (I'm sure you know what that is already)
Musket (It's a spear/gun hybrid)
Now for dual wielding swords...... It's better if you have a sword and dagger, sword and buckler, or two short swords. Because you could move the sword and dagger/buckler without them hitting each other.
Usually, in historical fighting, the dagger or buckler was primarily used for parrying, then attacking with the sword. But they could be used to harm or disarm the opponent.