Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And...me too.w8 till you get to know me : D
The goal of this thread is not to go after players who try to snake other's looting spots, "stealing a loot spot isn't against our rules" and not to point out existing recourse against trolls, such as reporting, either. It's to brainstorm mechanics that could be added to the game that would discourage the abusive language and bullying of trolls in land situations as the boot option for sailing did for sailing. I am not advocating for any rules changes, such as instituting reserved looting spots, nor am I advocating for more servers, I do not believe that lack of looting spots has anything to do with this issue at all. I'm certainly not of the opinion that TLOPO staff are unaware, unsympathetic, or unwilling to try to work on this issue.Hey there, figured this needed a response.
1. If you believe a player is breaking our Terms of Service, please report them. However, stealing a loot spot isn’t against our rules. We won’t ban players for stealing “your” loot spot. POTCO didn’t ban players for this anyways
2. Adding more servers to create more loot spots comes at a cost. We have to pay for the servers and many servers (outside of Abassa/Andaba) have 20 players on them at most during busy hours. To pay for more servers wouldn’t solve the issue anyways.
3. The suggestions regarding ignoring said players is the best course of action. One other note, if you don’t report the players (if they are breaking our terms), please don’t assume TLOPO has a blind eye for it.
As you do, I like @Blondie357 idea about moderators themselves being (physically) brought into the situation. Her idea, again, can be found here: https://piratesforums.co/threads/you-meet-the-nicest-people-in-this-game.29001/post-377850The goal of this thread is not to go after players who try to snake other's looting spots, "stealing a loot spot isn't against our rules" and not to point out existing recourse against trolls, such as reporting, either. It's to brainstorm mechanics that could be added to the game that would discourage the abusive language and bullying of trolls in land situations as the boot option for sailing did for sailing. I am not advocating for any rules changes, such as instituting reserved looting spots, nor am I advocating for more servers, I do not believe that lack of looting spots has anything to do with this issue at all. I'm certainly not of the opinion that TLOPO staff are unaware, unsympathetic, or unwilling to try to work on this issue.
At this point there was a suggestion of a call for moderation system which I sense has potential:
- I feel that speed of consequences is crucial to discouraging this behavior, I have no proof or data to support that. If moderators were able to quickly check on each situation and if they had simple rules that allowed for very quick decision making then this could accomplish that part of the equation. Exactly what such rules might be is up for debate for sure. I worry that such a scheme might overload moderators and so be impractical but I really don't know.
- The recourse on such interventions should be fairly minimal with minimal record keeping, keep things simple. I envision quickly booting a player to their desktop and locking their account from the server that the infraction occurred in for say 24 hours so that they could not use the same account to go back to the same place. Of course there could be more standard consequences such as bans for repeat offenses or extreme language and bullying but I'm not really pushing for that. I more want to aim at removing the troll from the situation very quickly rather than punishing everyone that does a little trolling, make it hard for them to persist long in any situation thus discourage the behavior.
Not really a fan of your red ray idea, I think that a moderator could be called in by the plaintiff without any other person being notified and that the moderator could and should simply observe what is going on without communicating to anyone simply making their assessment based on observation alone. And, yes, of course, there should be rules that the moderator is required to follow that are published and easy to find and understand. The rules should be simple and should make it easy for the moderator to do all that he/she needs to do and move on. When a moderator is summoned and they observe nothing irregular going on they should simply move on without taking action. In a scheme such asAs you do, I like @Blondie357 idea about moderators themselves being (physically) brought into the situation. Her idea, again, can be found here: https://piratesforums.co/threads/you-meet-the-nicest-people-in-this-game.29001/post-377850
What if...a RED colored "ray of light" mechanic could be instituted into the game to where when a pirate feels another is guilty of an infraction an option exists for them to shower a ray upon said player which follows them around until a moderator has the opportunity to call upon said beacon? This mechanic would:
- Mark immediately a pirate causing trouble (to which they could not escape the ray's cloud shadow or 'light' unless a). a moderator on that server alone could address or, b.) they would have to log off but couldn't return back to the same server for 24 hours)
- Physically draw-in a moderator's presence (into a game circumstance) where their presence alone would likely deter further abuse occurring
- The burden of guilt or innocence would immediately be heard to which the moderator would be called to act according to pre-determined guidelines or rules the TLOPO staff shall have posted publicly for everyone to easily understand prior to logging onto the game
- The player having the option to shower the other with the ray of light couldn't leave the area or...the ray itself would disappear, making it difficult for players to abuse the system until after a moderator's decision was completely made (on-the-spot)
Not too many people, OK...just about everyone, has never agreed with my hard-line approach towards keeping unruly pirates accountable. So really Eric, no worries there.Not really a fan of your red ray idea, I think that a moderator could be called in by the plaintiff without any other person being notified and that the moderator could and should simply observe what is going on without communicating to anyone simply making their assessment based on observation alone. And, yes, of course, there should be rules that the moderator is required to follow that are published and easy to find and understand. The rules should be simple and should make it easy for the moderator to do all that he/she needs to do and move on. When a moderator is summoned and they observe nothing irregular going on they should simply move on without taking action. In a scheme such as
this it might be easy for a troll to falsely summon moderators, need to have a way to control that???
In my real personal life, I am about as easy going and patient with others as they come. (I believe strongly in both forgiveness and second chances).I feel that the actions described clearly violated at least one rule, and that was ruining another's gaming experience but I guess that would be up to the moderator that would be handling it.. and a simple in game function or button somewhere on the game screen that we could click to request one to tp.. would suffice.
Also, I'm not sure how that would work either Shamus because wouldn't that be considered shaming another pirate by having a beacon on them? Frankly, I think that rule is outdated. It may have worked in POTCO (IF that's where it originated) but it no longer seems beneficial now. Some pirates NEED to be shamed to an extent if that's what it takes to stop their behavior. It's ridiculous that they can get away with some of the things they say to other pirates. I witnessed an argument on Tortuga last nite that was just digusting. If they are allowed to carry on that way, they should be singled out in whatever means necessary. Just my opinion.
Not too many people, OK...just about everyone, has never agreed with my hard-line approach towards keeping unruly pirates accountable. So really Eric, no worries there.
In my opinion, there is no other way to hold others accountable (online) in a public setting such as this forums or TLOPO. *Niceties must be put aside because if there is one (1) lesson learned to which we can take away from POTCO it's that niceties and a "reactive" approach has failed towards stamping out pirates whom intentionally cause trouble. This was our past and apparently...it is still happening.
To "walk quietly and carry a big stick" is not too popular today but I beg to ask, what choice do we have? *Something attached or to which MARKS a pirate (for wrong doing) temporarily in-game is the quickest way to influence a change in their behavior. I believe this to be so because nothing else yet has worked.
I feel that the actions described clearly violated at least one rule, and that was ruining another's gaming experience but I guess that would be up to the moderator that would be handling it.. and a simple in game function or button somewhere on the game screen that we could click to request one to tp.. would suffice.
Also, I'm not sure how that would work either Shamus because wouldn't that be considered shaming another pirate by having a beacon on them? Frankly, I think that rule is outdated. It may have worked in POTCO (IF that's where it originated) but it no longer seems beneficial now. Some pirates NEED to be shamed to an extent if that's what it takes to stop their behavior. It's ridiculous that they can get away with some of the things they say to other pirates. I witnessed an argument on Tortuga last nite that was just digusting. If they are allowed to carry on that way, they should be singled out in whatever means necessary. Just my opinion.
My basic idea is that trolling on ships was pretty much eliminated by the boot option and it was not through any heavy handed punishments and was more about quick response and the trolls being unable to persist for enough time to seriously interrupt anyone’s game. My hope is that we can come up with a similar concept for land. One that is focused on quick removal of the troll from the situation not on bans , branding, or other punishments. A troll can’t ply his trade in only a line or two of text. I think that the boot option was very effective even though it doesn’t change the hearts of trolls nor does it punish trolls. It makes it difficult to troll. That is what I’m after, ideas that can add mechanics to the game that make trolling more difficult.Not too many people, OK...just about everyone, has never agreed with my hard-line approach towards keeping unruly pirates accountable. So really Eric, no worries there.
In my opinion, there is no other way to hold others accountable (online) in a public setting such as this forums or TLOPO. *Niceties must be put aside because if there is one (1) lesson learned to which we can take away from POTCO it's that niceties and a "reactive" approach has failed towards stamping out pirates whom intentionally cause trouble. This was our past and apparently...it is still happening.
To "walk quietly and carry a big stick" is not too popular today but I beg to ask, what choice do we have? *Something attached or to which MARKS a pirate (for wrong doing) temporarily in-game is the quickest way to influence a change in their behavior. I believe this to be so because nothing else yet has worked.
The only option I can think of is something which directly brings a moderator physically into the situation in-game (because there is no other way to 'boot' someone on land being the justification alone encompasses numerous reasons/possibilities only a moderator alone can resolve). This brings then the "how" into the equation but unless you report someone, how then shall this be achieved?My basic idea is that trolling on ships was pretty much eliminated by the boot option and it was not through any heavy handed punishments and was more about quick response and the trolls being unable to persist for enough time to seriously interrupt anyone’s game. My hope is that we can come up with a similar concept for land. One that is focused on quick removal of the troll from the situation not on bans , branding, or other punishments. A troll can’t ply his trade in only a line or two of text. I think that the boot option was very effective even though it doesn’t change the hearts of trolls nor does it punish trolls. It makes it difficult to troll. That is what I’m after, ideas that can add mechanics to the game that make trolling more difficult.
I think the how can be accomplished by a call button that would call a moderator that is already in game and that the moderator could then observe the situation with no markers on players and no interaction with either party, just go see what’s going on and decide for themselves under the guidance of rules for dealing with such situations. If it’s truly a troll they will be easily identified by their actions. Another thing is that I’m sure moderation mistakes are sure to happen no matter how good the safeguards against it are and so that is part of why I’m against the heavy handed approach. I feel that the sailing boot option was brilliantly executed so as to discourage trolling without dire consequences for anyone, guilty or not.The only option I can think of is something which directly brings a moderator physically into the situation in-game (because there is no other way to 'boot' someone on land being the justification alone encompasses numerous reasons/possibilities only a moderator alone can resolve). This brings then the "how" into the equation but unless you report someone, how then shall this be achieved?
A ray of light is the only thing I can think of to resolve this. In addition, said beacon could actually boost the enthusiasm of moderators themselves...giving them a direct line to carry forth their roles. Ever heard of superheroes? I think deep down in-game moderators could be a hero for at least someone being bullied.
A ray shown in the sky could do this.
I think the how can be accomplished by a call button that would call a moderator that is already in game and that the moderator could then observe the situation with no markers on players and no interaction with either party, just go see what’s going on and decide for themselves under the guidance of rules for dealing with such situations. If it’s truly a troll they will be easily identified by their actions. Another thing is that I’m sure moderation mistakes are sure to happen no matter how good the safeguards against it are and so that is part of why I’m against the heavy handed approach. I feel that the sailing boot option was brilliantly executed so as to discourage trolling without dire consequences for anyone, guilty or not.
I’m sure moderation mistakes are sure to happen no matter how good the safeguards against it are